Socrates later offers a proof that no harm can come to a good person and death is not to be feared. It has probably happened to everyone in this room at one time or another that you finished writing something on your word processor, went to save it, and it disappeared.
So adamant is he about this he is willing to die. And, too, Chaerophon was a great friend of both Socrates and the democracy. He asserts that horses are improved by only a handful of people, namely, those with the required knowledge, the horse trainers.
Socrates begins his speech by establishing his ethos, meaning his credibility as a speaker. Socrates strongly believes in the difference between right and wrong and the value of his reputation when it comes to those aspects of life. So he refuses to play along i.
As the defendant under trial, Socrates tells the jury that he would rather be himself than be anyone else. That in searching for a man wiser than himself, his questioning earned him the dubious reputation of social gadfly to the city of Athens.
To the jurors who voted to acquit him, Socrates gives encouragement: As a modern reader, one would think that Socrates clearly proved his innocence and that the law and society of Athens at the time had to have been corrupt. Its once strong democracy was taken over by Thirty Tyrants for nine months who executed over one thousand Athenians.
In fact, he had good reasons for refusing to take money for what he was doing. Socrates refused to participate and certainly would have been punished had the Thirty not been abolished soon thereafter.
Some recent notes and comments I made in my own reading of the apology. In each case, the reputation of the individual was an ill-founded one, for upon being questioned and examined by Socrates it became evident that they did not possess the wisdom attributed to them.
Although it was the stated reason for his indictment, the actual reason seems to have been the fact that his teachings were regarded as dangerous to those who were in positions of power. Again Socrates points out another source of the prejudice against him that has developed over the years.
One reason for rejecting them was the fact that the gods were credited with immoral acts of a type that would never be tolerated among human beings. Contrary to many people at the time, Socrates did not lecture about the things he knew; he actually claimed to be rather ignorant.
But this court wants it both ways: Hence Socrates undermines the first main accusation against him, and demonstrates that Meletus is ignorant of the very knowledge necessary to make the relevant charge. Socrates immediately delves into his moral deontology explaining that he does not worry oneself about the opinion of the majority or the fate of his children.
Finally, after the court's dismissal of the proposed reward — free meals at the Pyrtaneum — Socrates considers imprisonment and banishmentbefore settling upon a punishment fine of drachmae.
That his false reputation as a sophistical philosopher comes from his enemies, all of whom are malicious and envious of him, yet must remain nameless — except for the playwright Aristophaneswho lampooned him Socrates as a charlatan-philosopher in the comedy play The Clouds BC.
That, as spokesman for the Oracle at Delphi, he is to spur the Athenians to greater awareness of ethics and moral conduct, and always shall question and argue, even if his accusers — Lycon, Anytus, and Meletus — withdraw their accusations against him.
Good introduction of a counter argument — make sure to have a solid one like that in the next assignment as well. He claimed he was wise only because he recognized his ignorance and did not claim to know what he did not know Grube We still feel that a few individuals can corrupt an entire nation of youth, whereas the majority is thought to be on the right track for improving them.
He is not a rhetorician, and they should be ashamed for suggesting that he would try to lead them astray by the force of his eloquence. He inquires whether the accusation is that he believes in new divinities the implication being that Socrates is not atheistor is it that he does not believe in any god whatsoever, and thus it is his atheism that corrupts the youth 26c.
He was not afraid to die. It can be argued that Socrates, in both texts is being consistent with a higher law. Analysis of Plato's Apology The Apology is Plato's recollection and interpretation of the Trial of Socrates ( BC). In this dialogue Socrates explains who he is and what kind of life he led.
The Apology of Socrates Essay examples; Women in the Apology of Socrates Essay Words | 6 Pages. Construct an argument supporting or refuting this claim. Be sure to incorporate textual evidence. In Plato’s Apology, Socrates comes off as a defiant and disobedient man with little respect for his accusers and even for the jurors on.
Crito & Apology Essay. In the Apology, Socrates recounts how he disobeyed the unjust order of the Thirty Tyrants to arrest a fellow citizen; he also claims that he will never stop philosophizing, regardless of what the legally constituted political authority commands - Crito & Apology Essay introduction.
Yet, in the Crito, Socrates provides numerous arguments for obeying the decision of the. - The main argument in The Apology by famous ancient Greek philosopher Plato is whether, notorious speaker and philosopher Socrates is corrupting the youth by preaching ungodly theories and teaching them unlawful ideas that do harm to individuals and society.
The Apology of Socrates, by Plato The Project Gutenberg Edition Trans: Benjamin Jowett INTRODUCTION. shall use the words and arguments which occur to me at the moment; for I am confident in the justice of my cause (Or, I am certain that I am.
SOCRATES ON LIFE AND DEATH (PLATO, APOLOGY 4oCC7) Before we move to the argument itself and the concerns it raises, let me make a few preliminary remarks on its context.Argument in the apology